Back to PLS Help

Significant LV1 but no reliable clusters with BSR=2.57
Jayachandra
Posted on 02/16/16 10:34:19
Number of posts: 14
Jayachandra posts:

Hello,

I have performed a mean centering PLS analyses with 5000 permutations and 500 bootstrapping samples to detect the structural differences between two groups of subjects. And i observe that LV1 is significant with P<0.05 and shows that there is a pattern corresponding to the group difference in the brain structure. But when i use a bootstrapping threshold of 2.57, i do not see any reliable clusters that survive this threshold.

How do i interpret this result? 

1) Even though LV1 significantly shows that there is a group difference, should i  still conclude that there is no reliable spatial location corresponding to the pattern shown by LV1? Is it that the pattern is a global effect in the brain and cannot be pinned to a specific spatial location?

or

2) Does it mean that the pattern shown by LV1 does not exist any where in the brain?

Best Wishes

Jay

Replies:

Untitled Post
rmcintosh
Posted on 02/16/16 10:38:40
Number of posts: 394
rmcintosh replies:

quote:

Hello,

I have performed a mean centering PLS analyses with 5000 permutations and 500 bootstrapping samples to detect the structural differences between two groups of subjects. And i observe that LV1 is significant with P<0.05 and shows that there is a pattern corresponding to the group difference in the brain structure. But when i use a bootstrapping threshold of 2.57, i do not see any reliable clusters that survive this threshold.

How do i interpret this result? 

1) Even though LV1 significantly shows that there is a group difference, should i  still conclude that there is no reliable spatial location corresponding to the pattern shown by LV1? Is it that the pattern is a global effect in the brain and cannot be pinned to a specific spatial location?

or

2) Does it mean that the pattern shown by LV1 does not exist any where in the brain?

Best Wishes

Jay

Hi Jay - there is nothing magical about the threshold 2.57.  You can use 2.3 or even 1.96 so long as you are clear on what you are infering from your results.  Its entirely possible to get a broad effect that at an individual voxel level seems weak, but is sufficiently relable to produce a multivariate effect




Login to reply to this topic.

  • Keep in touch

Enter your email above to receive electronic messages from Baycrest, including invitations to programs and events, newsletters, updates and other communications.
You can unsubscribe at any time.
Please refer to our Privacy Policy or contact us for more details.

  • Follow us on social
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Contact Us:

3560 Bathurst Street
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M6A 2E1
Phone: (416) 785-2500

Baycrest is an academic health sciences centre fully affiliated with the University of Toronto