Dear PLS experts,
I am new with PLS and sorry if my question seems trivial.
I am planning to compare spatial patterns (similarity and differences) of resting state functional connectivity of two seeds over 2 years (two time points). I have a question about how to optimally set this up.
Let’s assume that we have one time point for now.
I am planning to run a fake task PLS first to extract the signal for two ROIs. When I set up task PLS module, I only define ONE condition with TRs for the onset of each block and then put 5TR as block length. That means if I have 170 volumes (TR = 2), the onset and during should look like below:
Condition1:
Onset: 0 5.5TR 11TR 16.5TR 22TR 27.5TR 33TR 38.5TR 44TR 49.5TR 55TR 60.5TR 66TR 71.5TR 77 TR
Length: 5TR (10sec)
But PLS average across all blocks within a condition, so instead of a figure 1B (demonstrating correlation scores for 30 blocks) presented in Grig and Grady, I get one averaged block for my only condition. So, I am just wondering if one has to define blocks as different conditions during creating of session files? Or instead one should split Resting state fMRI data into a number of blocks (using for example fslsplit) and set them as different runs, and then create data mat with “not-averaging-across-run” option?
Thanks for your help.
Sina
Dear PLS experts,
I am new with PLS and sorry if my question seems trivial.
I am planning to compare spatial patterns (similarity and differences) of resting state functional connectivity of two seeds over 2 years (two time points). I have a question about how to optimally set this up.
Let’s assume that we have one time point for now.
I am planning to run a fake task PLS first to extract the signal for two ROIs. When I set up task PLS module, I only define ONE condition with TRs for the onset of each block and then put 5TR as block length. That means if I have 170 volumes (TR = 2), the onset and during should look like below:
Condition1:
Onset: 0 5.5TR 11TR 16.5TR 22TR 27.5TR 33TR 38.5TR 44TR 49.5TR 55TR 60.5TR 66TR 71.5TR 77 TR
Length: 5TR (10sec)
But PLS average across all blocks within a condition, so instead of a figure 1B (demonstrating correlation scores for 30 blocks) presented in Grig and Grady, I get one averaged block for my only condition. So, I am just wondering if one has to define blocks as different conditions during creating of session files? Or instead one should split Resting state fMRI data into a number of blocks (using for example fslsplit) and set them as different runs, and then create data mat with “not-averaging-across-run” option?
Thanks for your help.
Sina
thanks for your question. Sina.
For now you will have use your option #2, which is what Grigg & Grady did. We are working on a new release of PLS that will allow more flexibility, but it will be several more months before it is available
Randy
Baycrest is an academic health sciences centre fully affiliated with the University of Toronto
Privacy Statement - Disclaimer - © 1989-2024 BAYCREST HEALTH SCIENCE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED